Beneficiaries may be in for a pleasant surprise when it comes to their Social Security benefits because the government has a new strategy to boost them that has nothing to do with the cost of living adjustment (COLA).
Legislators from both parties are pushing for a bill that would increase Social Security payouts for those Americans who qualify for pensions. Representatives Abigail Spanberger, a Democratic from Virginia, and Garret Graves, a Republican from Louisiana, filed a discharge petition this week, potentially forcing a vote on the Social Security Fairness Act.
The act seeks to remove two regulations that currently lower Social Security benefits for workers, their spouses, or widows who get pensions.
A new strategy to boost Social Security benefits for US recipients
Due to the law’s bipartisan backing, experts believe it has a chance of passing. If the petition gathers 218 signatures, a vote will be required.
Even though they have paid into the Social Security system like all other Americans, retired workers—which includes government officials like teachers, police officers, firefighters, and postal workers—can receive smaller Social Security payouts.
Many pensions may result in reduced payments if their employers do not withhold Social Security taxes, even though the majority of Americans work occupations that qualify them for benefits.
Furthermore, remember that if your pension is derived from what Social Security refers to as covered employment, meaning you paid payroll taxes, it has no bearing on your benefits. The great majority of Americans, according to AARP‘s website, work occupations that qualify them for Social Security payments.
However, suppose you worked for a pension-granting company that did not withhold taxes and was not covered by Social Security.
You would still be eligible for benefits if you worked for the company long enough to accrue coverage under Social Security. In some situations, the windfall elimination provision (WEP) may cause your monthly payment to decrease.
Work Experience Pay (WEP) and the Government Pension Offset (GPO) can lower American payouts. Reductions in program benefits occur when an employer of a retired worker is not obligated to make tax contributions to the WEP. More than two million workers will get smaller Social Security benefits as a result.
In the meanwhile, almost 745,000 Americans will see a corresponding reduction in GPO payments for spouses and widows who also get pensions.
According to Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor at the University of Tennessee at Martin, receiving benefits from a pension that belonged to a spouse or other family member may occasionally result in a person’s eligibility for Social Security payments being reduced.
Beene went on to say that some people may receive a shock to their retirement income as a result of the regulations, which essentially remove their monthly Social Security payouts. The regulations’ affected seniors have long complained that they have to work longer hours or put off retiring since their Social Security benefits are smaller.
You May Also Read:
- New Changes: What Does the $1,375 Monthly Cut Mean for Social Security Recipients?
- Is Social Security Really Sending Out $2,829 and $1,960 Checks to Retirees and SSDI Recipients?
- Is a $12,000 Stimulus Check Coming in September 2024? Get the Latest Updates
Some, on the other hand, argue that doing away with the WEP and GPO would unjustly benefit those who don’t often pay into Social Security. For the Social Security Administration, whose present budget issues would mean reduced benefits by the middle of the 2030s, it would also be costly.
Considering that the Congressional Budget Office projects that doing away with the GPO and WEP will come with a ten-year cost of $196 billion, the extra expense may hasten the timeline for beneficiaries around the nation. Many legislators still think that the law has to be significantly changed in spite of these worries.
In Beene’s opinion, assisting these people in receiving their full Social Security pension will be very helpful to them in their post-work years.
