Kansas Governor Kelly Stands Firm Against $2.3 Billion Tax Reform Bill

Kansas Governor Kelly Stands Firm Against $2.3 Billion Tax Reform Bill

The $2.3 billion property, sales, and income tax reduction bill is a five-year plan, but Topeka Democrat Gov. Laura Kelly announced on the KCUR radio show “Up To Date” that she would veto it because it would be too expensive and produce budgetary issues in the near future.

She said that a call for a special session of the Legislature to work on an alternative tax scheme would accompany the veto.

Kelly stated that after calling a special session of the Legislature to evaluate an alternative plan, discussion regarding significant tax reform would go back up at the statehouse.

She committed to presenting a new tax proposal for House and Senate members to consider in an interview with Steve Kraske on KCUR’s “Up To Date” news program.

“I have made it very clear from the get-go that I will veto any bill that came to me that would put Kansas in financial jeopardy. The bill the Legislature passed would do exactly that,” the Democratic governor stated. “There is absolutely no way that I would sign it. I’ll call the Legislature back into a special session to pass a good tax cut bill.”

Despite the current multibillion-dollar revenue excess, Kelly predicted that the flurry of tax-reduction laws voted by the 2024 Legislature will cause financial troubles for the state government within a few years.

She claimed that the proposals’ combined annual loss of more than $500 million would be unsupportable.

She warned that it might result in budgetary issues such to those experienced by Gov. Sam Brownback’s administration, which plunged the state into debt by sharply lowering the state income tax without correspondingly cutting spending.

“We do have enough money to do a very robust tax cut, just not as much as the Legislature proposed,” Kelly stated. “There’s no way in the world that I would put my signature on a bill that I think will take us back to those (Brownback) days of four-day school weeks, crumbling roads and bridges, a foster care system that was totally broken. I can’t do that. I promised the people of Kansas that I would fix things. I did and I’m not going to now break them.”

The proposed measure would do away with the 2% sales tax on food in the state, effective July 1, 2025, as opposed to January 1, 2025. In the tax year 2024, it would eliminate the state income tax on Social Security benefits.

Read Also: Kansas Lawmakers Forge Tax Plan Deal, Governor Kelly’s Approval Expected

The bill would increase the exemption from property taxes associated with the state’s school finance levy to $100,000. Compared to the existing $42,000 exemption, that would be a significant rise. There would be a reduction in the mill charge for education from 20 mills to 19.5 mills in property tax.

The state’s highest income tax rate would drop from 5.7% to 5.57%, and the standard deduction and personal exemption would increase in relation to income taxes. The lower income tax rate in the state would decrease to 5.2% from 5.25%.

Mid-April reports from the state’s tax revenue forecasters indicated that Kansas would have an excess of $2.6 billion in the general treasury and $1.7 billion in a special rainy-day reserve by June 30 of the current fiscal year. According to the prediction, the state could end the next fiscal year with a $1.9 billion general fund surplus and $1.8 billion in the emergency account if state tax collection was cut by $530 million.

The Overland Park Republican who leads the House Majority, Chris Croft, stated that the governor had no right to reject SB 37 because of the state’s projected surplus.

“Under our bipartisan tax relief plan,” Croft stated to constituents, “every Kansan gets a tax cut, no matter their income. Only one signature stands between you and tax relief.”

Legislator Jason Probst, a Democrat from Hutchinson, stated that the state could afford the tax adjustments included in SB 37. He was one of the House members that supported the legislation.

“In my experience, we don’t get many chances to give real money to real people before the big money players come to get theirs,” Probst stated. “I have a real worry that if we miss this moment, most of the tax cuts will go — once again — to people who don’t need it.”

Reference

profile
With more than two years of expertise in news and analysis, Eileen Stewart is a seasoned reporter. Eileen is a respected voice in this field, well-known for her sharp reporting and insightful analysis. Her writing covers a wide range of subjects, from politics to culture and more.