Woodbridge Township, situated in the northern part of Middlesex County, New Jersey, is a suburban area with a population exceeding 100,000 residents. This locale functions as a pivotal point for transportation and commercial activities, serving as a significant residential area for those working in New York City.
Nonetheless, akin to many sizeable and varied townships, Woodbridge does encounter its proportion of safety and crime concerns. According to the most recent crime data sourced from NeighborhoodScout, the subsequent list outlines the five most dangerous neighborhoods within Woodbridge exhibiting the highest crime rates per 1,000 residents.
Hopelawn, nestled in the southeastern part of Woodbridge, is a compact neighborhood housing around 2,000 residents. The area exhibits a crime rate of 22.64 for every 1,000 inhabitants, slightly surpassing the township’s average.
The odds of falling victim to property crime here stand at 1 in 44, whereas the township-wide odds are 1 in 69. Although less frequent, instances of violent crimes including assault, robbery, and homicide do occur sporadically. The likelihood of being a victim of violent crime in Hopelawn is 1 in 333, as opposed to 1 in 417 for the entire township.
Keasbey, situated in the southeastern part of Woodbridge, is a small neighborhood with around 3,000 residents. The neighborhood’s crime rate stands at 23.32 per 1,000 residents, slightly surpassing both Hopelawn’s rate and the township’s average.
In comparison to Hopelawn, Keasbey experiences a higher percentage of violent crimes, constituting approximately 30% of all reported offenses in the area. The likelihood of falling victim to a violent crime in Keasbey is 1 in 144, contrasting with 1 in 417 for the entire township. Property crimes also prevail in Keasbey, with a 1 in 51 chance of being targeted, as opposed to 1 in 69 for the whole township.
Fords, situated in the southwestern part of Woodbridge, is a larger neighborhood with around 15,000 residents. The neighborhood records a crime rate of 24.17 per 1,000 residents, surpassing both Keasbey’s rate and the township’s average. Similar to Keasbey, Fords experiences a proportional distribution of violent and property crimes, constituting approximately 29% of all reported crimes.
The likelihood of falling victim to a violent crime in Fords stands at 1 in 145, whereas for the entire township, it’s 1 in 417. Instances of property crimes are also notable in Fords, with a likelihood of 1 in 49, in comparison to the township’s average of 1 in 69.
Avenel, situated in the western part of Woodbridge, is a larger neighborhood with approximately 18,000 residents. Its crime rate stands at 25.76 per 1,000 residents, surpassing both Fords and the township’s average. In Avenel, violent crimes constitute a larger portion of the overall crime incidents compared to Fords, making up about 34% of all reported offenses.
The likelihood of experiencing a violent crime in Avenel is 1 in 117, whereas for the entire township, it’s 1 in 417. Property crimes are also prevalent in Avenel, with a 1 in 47 chance of falling victim to such incidents, compared to the township-wide odds of 1 in 69.
Port Reading stands out as the most perilous district in Woodbridge Township, inhabited by roughly 4,000 individuals. The recorded crime rate is 36.85 incidents per 1,000 residents, significantly surpassing both Avenel and the township’s overall average.
Notably, Port Reading exhibits a notably elevated proportion of violent crimes, comprising approximately 46% of all offenses within the neighborhood. The likelihood of falling victim to a violent crime in Port Reading is 1 in 72, a stark contrast to the 1 in 417 odds for the entire township. Additionally, incidents of property crimes run rampant in Port Reading, with the probability of being a victim standing at 1 in 34, in contrast to 1 in 69 for the entire township.
These five most dangerous neighboorhoods share certain elements that might play a role in their elevated crime rates. These factors include poverty, joblessness, limited educational attainment, and a deficit in social services. Nonetheless, each neighborhood possesses distinct attributes that could impact its safety status.
These factors encompass proximity to industrial zones, major roadways, and nearby urban centers. Consequently, recognizing the particular hazards and obstacles that each area encounters is crucial. Taking suitable measures to safeguard oneself and personal belongings is of utmost importance.